health care reform failed to cure prices

is the law of 2010, as Vice President Biden said, "big [expletive] business." This leads us on the path toward universal health insurance. This is a favorite target for the Republicans a chance to take over Congress. Lawmakers who support could lose their jobs. And it will remain the center of attention after the midterms, as Democrats defended him against legal and political challenges through 2014, when it takes full effect. Easily Provide Me

But the Democrats' efforts to sell to the public law may be compromised even what some ardent supporters consider his greatest work around manjak.Remont left nearly one great element of our health care dilemma: the problem of price. Simply put, Americans pay much more for every bit of care - tests, procedures, hospital, drugs, devices - than people in other rich countries.

Health services in the United States have enormous power to set prices. There is no government "single payer" on the other side of the table, and the consolidation of hospitals and doctors has left insurers and employers in a weak negotiating position.

"We spend less per capita on hospital compared with other developed countries, we see the doctor less often, and we swallow fewer pills," said Jon Kingsdale, who oversaw the implementation of the 2006 Massachusetts health care law. "We just pay more for each of these units than in other countries."

2010 Act is little to address this. A number of cost control provisions are directed towards reducing the amount of care we consume, we can not pay cijenu.Zakon encourages doctors and hospitals to join the "accountable care organizations" that have financial incentives to limit unnecessary care, it beefs up "comparative effectiveness research" to to eliminate ineffective treatments, and eventually will be taxed the most expensive insurance plans to curb consumers' excessive use of health care.


Such measures could reduce redundant tests, emergency room visits and hospital readmissions, which will help control Medicare costs, where the government sets the rates. But they are less likely to lower prices outside to stop the growth of Medicare and private insurance rates.

The main reason for this policy. Remember to pull-out health care battle? It started in spring 2009 and ran for a full year. Bill proponents in the White House and Congress have had some idea of how difficult the fight will be with. Taking into hospitals, doctors and drug and device manufacturers as well - people would face in fighting over the price - can be fatal.

So, it was not cost borba.Zakon will go to the face probably post-Republican attack on the midterm - and disassembly can be easier if Americans think they are a little to curb costs. This is one of those small political irony: Law deride as socialism might have easily won the favor of the skeptical public if it is, well, a little more socialist.

It is quite far from socialism as stoji.Uprava decided not to seek lower drug prices for Medicare, and did not press the "public option" government-run insurance plan that people could buy up to 65 years in. While supporters of the public option sell it as a way to compete with insurers, hospitals and the target liječnici.Javni choice to create a national purchaser of health care that could be used to influence service providers to reduce prices. This would reduce costs by reducing Law subsidy required for affordable insurance.